Experts(in this case, math teachers), would have to evaluate the content validity by comparing the test to the learning objectives. of each question, analyzing whether each one covers the aspects that the test was designed to cover.Ī 4th grade math test would have high content validity if it covered all the skills taught in that grade. Reliability refers to a tools ability to measure whatever is being measured accurately. Assessing content validity is more systematic and relies on expert evaluation. Validity refers to a tools ability to measure what it claims to measure. On the other hand, content validity evaluates how well a test represents all the aspects of a topic. In other words, validity s defined as whether a test is effective at measuring. When a test has strong face validity, anyone would agree that the test’s questions appear to measure what they are intended to measure.įor example, looking at a 4th grade math test consisting of problems in which students have to add and multiply, most people would agree that it has strong face validity (i.e., it looks like a math test). Reliability is the consistency of measurements over time and administrations while validity is goodness of fit. The difference is that face validity is subjective, and assesses content at surface level. Face validity and content validity are similar in that they both evaluate how suitable the content of a test is.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |